Internet choices after Google I/O: five privacy-first search alternatives to consider

After Google's May 19 push to merge Search with AI, internet users seeking privacy can try five free search engines, though results may be less comprehensive.

By
Brittany Shaw
Editor
Technology journalist focused on accessibility, diversity in STEM, and the human impact of emerging technologies. TED fellow.
34 Views
4 Min Read
0 Comments
Internet choices after Google I/O: five privacy-first search alternatives to consider

On May 19 at its I/O developers conference, Google announced major steps to combine Google Search with its advanced AI tools, a move the company framed as a shift in how people find information online. captured the change in one word — he said Search is moving into an "agentic" era — and his comment landed as Google signaled a deeper fusion of search results and generative AI features.

The announcement has pushed some users to look beyond Google for routine queries. There are five other free search engines positioned as alternatives, and they sell two clear trade-offs: stronger privacy protections and a possibility of less comprehensive results. For users who want to keep more of their activity off the record, those trade-offs are increasingly worth testing.

is one of the better-known privacy-first options. It blocks third‑party trackers by default and uses Google as a fallback when its own index returns few results — and it lets users anonymously check Google for the same query without leaving the Brave experience. Brave also bundles a VPN, a crypto wallet and an AI assistant called Leo; the company says AI use with Leo is private and secure and that users do not need an account or to log in to use the assistant.

has marketed itself as the anti‑Google: it does not track user activity and actively blocks external trackers. The company has expanded beyond search tools into App Tracking Protection for Android and offers its own VPN, plus an AI tool named DuckAssist to help summarize or refine searches while keeping the session untracked.

pitches a different selling point. The search engine says it has planted more than 250 million trees and that all of its profits go toward climate action. Ecosia also says it produces more clean energy than it consumes to power its searches and AI queries. Technically, Ecosia relies on results from Google and Microsoft Bing to fill in search listings, and it has moved this year toward working with European partners on an independent index.

Paris‑based presents itself as a privacy alternative with features aimed at families and users who want granular control over AI. Qwant says it does not retain search data or sell personal data; it offers Qwant Junior for children ages 6 to 12 and has integrated AI features it calls Flash Answers, which users can turn off in Settings. The engine has historically used Bing's search API and, like Ecosia, has participated in efforts to build a European search index to reduce dependence on U.S. companies.

Taken together, these options show why some users will try to move away from Google after the I/O announcements. The main advantage—stronger privacy on routine queries and often built‑in anti‑tracking tech—answers a specific demand from people uncomfortable with broader data collection. The main drawback is also straightforward: alternate engines may lack the comprehensive result sets that come from the scale of Google’s index and the resources behind it.

That contradiction is the story’s tension. Several privacy‑focused engines rely in part on the very companies users are trying to avoid: Ecosia taps Google and Microsoft for results, Qwant historically used Bing, and Brave can fall back to Google. At the same time, some of those same engines are investing in independent indexes or regional partnerships to reduce that dependence, a step that could tilt the balance over time but will not erase short‑term gaps in coverage.

For internet users deciding whether to switch, the near term will be about experimenting. Try a query in a privacy engine, check how often it returns full results, and be ready to accept occasional gaps. If the alternatives can complete more searches from their own indexes—an objective behind recent European partnerships—they will become harder to dismiss on the basis of comprehensiveness alone. Until then, Google’s scale and the company’s May 19 AI push keep it the default for users who need the broadest, fastest answers; the privacy engines remain the better choice for users who prioritize control over every query.

Share
Editor

Technology journalist focused on accessibility, diversity in STEM, and the human impact of emerging technologies. TED fellow.